We at the IIS are proud to launch a new research report, in partnership with National Council of Canadian Muslims (NCCM), called “Under Layered Suspicion: A Review of CRA Audits of Muslim-led Charities”. The report can be found at: layeredsuspicion.ca
The report finds potential biases and prejudicial policies that influence the Canada Revenue Agency’s (CRA) selection of Muslim-led charities for audit, the practices within those audits, and their findings.
The report was principally funded by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) and received supplementary funding from the Reading Muslims project, funded by the university of Toronto’s Connaught Secretariat.
Below is an excerpt from the Executive Summary:
Muslim-led charities have for years expressed concerns about the selection, frequency, and reasoning behind audits of their organizations.
The findings from Under Layered Suspicion suggest that there is a basis for these concerns. The report identifies whole-of-government policies and patterns of audit practices that together evince potential biases in Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) audits of Muslim-led charities.
Under Layered Suspicion draws attention to the Government of Canada’s anti-terrorism financing and anti-radicalization policies. When these policies are operationalized by the CRA’s Charities Directorate and the Review and Analysis Division (RAD), they create the conditions for potential structural bias against Muslim-led charities. The study shows that in the crosshairs of these policies, Muslim-led charities are uniquely vulnerable to penalties or even deregistration at the hands of the CRA.
This vulnerability takes shape through ordinary auditing techniques that occur in complicated global times. Under Layered Suspicion analyzes the evidence and interpretive frameworks of three audits in light of the political context within which they took place.
This report questions whether Muslim-led charities can be treated fairly in the course of audits that occur under the shadow of Canada’s anti-terrorism financing and anti-radicalization regimes.
The recommendations emphasize the need for the Government of Canada to formally investigate patterns of bias within the machinery of its agencies and bureaucracies, and create mechanisms of accountability.
RECOMMENDATIONS
To the Canada Revenue Agency
To Finance Canada
Review and revise Canada’s risk-based assessment of terrorism financing in Canada.
To Public Safety
Provide greater guidance to government officers on how its counter-radicalization strategy is to be applied in a non-discriminatory fashion.
Read the full report at: layeredsuspicion.ca
Postdoctoral Fellow Sana Patel was recently featured on The Scope (BritishMuslimTV) alongside Leila Bdeir to discuss Islamophobia in Canada. Sana explained that Canada has a long history of Islamophobia which includes American influence. She also described the ways in which online spaces allow Islamophobia to prevail due to their unregulated characteristics. You can view the full episode at: […]
February 12, 2023
We’re excited to share with you a new article from the Reading Muslims project. This entry – written by Jeffrey G. Reitz and co-authors Patrick Simon and Emily Laxer – outlines the findings from a comparative study on Canada’s and France’s effectiveness in integrating their Muslim minorities. The study questioned the narrative of Canada’s presumed […]
February 3, 2023
The Institute of Islamic Studies (IIS) is hiring for two positions: Business Officer & Administrative, Outreach and Communications Assistant to the Director. Given the expanding scope and operations, the IIS is bringing on more staff to enhance and support its various projects and work. We encourage anyone interested in working at the IIS to carefully […]
January 30, 2023