Reading Europe with Muslim Eyes (REME)
This piece explores the philosophical underpinnings of REME and affirms the fundamental role history plays in tempering understandings of our current moment.
November 29, 2025
On April 22, 2021, the Council of the Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT) unanimously voted (with one abstention) to censure the University of Toronto for violating academic freedom in the hiring process for the Faculty of Law’s International Human Rights Program Director. The Faculty of Law’s selection committee unanimously agreed on a single candidate, Dr. Valentina Azarova. Administrators and Dr. Azarova were in “advanced negotiations” when the then-Dean Edward Iacobucci put a halt to the selection process and reversed course. The University’s commissioned review into the affair was done by the Hon. Thomas Cromwell (ret). Cromwell, now senior counsel at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, found that a third party organization, the Council on Israel Jewish Affairs (CIJA), prompted a former director of its board, UofT alumnus and donor, and Federal Tax Court justice David Spiro, to make inquiries about the candidate, and convey concerns about her qualifications. CIJA’s concern with Dr. Azarova centered on her published scholarship critical of the State of Israel and its occupation of Palestinian territories. Details of the events that led to the scuttled hiring process have been widely reported, and can be found here. Cromwell found no wrongdoing by either Justice Spiro or Dean Iacobucci. CAUT adopted a different standard of review than Cromwell, focusing instead on plausibility. David Robinson, executive director of the CAUT, explained the reason for censure, “In a close examination of the facts of the case, CAUT Council found it implausible to conclude that the donor’s call did not trigger the subsequent actions resulting in the sudden termination of the hiring process.”
The censure is a powerful symbol that requires action to ensure the primacy of academic freedom. Academic units are complex institutions, and require careful calibration between respecting the censure and maintaining operational integrity given certain equities embedded in programming priorities. The Institute of Islamic Studies has, since 2018, been a vehicle for leveraging advanced research to recalibrate public conversations about communities that have for long remained on the margins. Indeed, through our research and programming, we have developed close working relationships with academics, community organizations, governmental bodies, and so on. Those relationships are in large part designed to interrogate through academic excellence and rigor the sometimes hegemonic discourses of academia, and the unduly coercive policies of the state on the bodies of racialized religious minorities in Canada, the United States and Europe. The Institute of Islamic Studies aims to respect the CAUT censure while ensuring that the recalibration we now effect through our work will continue. The import of this work is heightened by the recent attack in London, Ontario, which left four dead and orphaned a nine year old boy still recovering from his injuries. Of course, under the censure, nothing will be “business as usual”, but our core commitments to equity and academic freedom across all our projects remain unabated.
For as long as the censure remains in place, the IIS will undertake the following measures: